FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 285
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 285 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 285 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
GeForce GTX 285
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
204 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 482% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 285 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 285 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 285 - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 751 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 342 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
45−50
55−60
QHD / 1440p
27−30
30−35
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
7−8
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Fortnite is 16% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
55−60
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M5950.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
24−27
medium / 768p
12−14
16−18
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
GeForce GTX 285
Architecture
Terascale 2
Tesla 2.0
Code name
Whistler-XT
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
13 April 2011
23 December 2008
Pipelines
480
240
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1476 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.0
4.0
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
n/a
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
