FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 768MB will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 768MB - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 768MB - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 900 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 114% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 75% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 87% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | no data |
| Pipelines | 480 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |