FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 850A
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 850A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 850A.
GeForce GTX 850A
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 28% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 177 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 900 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 37.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |