FirePro M5950 vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 271% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 125 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 882 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 65% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GK107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |