FirePro M5950 vs GRID M6 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and GRID M6 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and GRID M6 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M6 8Q
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 185% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 3 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 4112 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 145% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 722 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 69.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |