FirePro M5950 vs GRID M60 1Q
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and GRID M60 1Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and GRID M60 1Q.
GRID M60 1Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | GRID M60 1Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 542% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and GRID M60 1Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 168 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 1Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 4112 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 271% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−105 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 195% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 164% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 85% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 212% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 311% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M5950. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | GRID M60 1Q | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Whistler-XT | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 480 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Check Price |