FirePro M5950 vs HD Graphics 630
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and HD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | HD Graphics 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 has 133% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and HD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 63 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and HD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and HD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 425 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and HD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and HD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | HD Graphics 630 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 26.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |