FirePro M5950 vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 208% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 65% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |