FirePro M5950 vs Quadro K2000
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Quadro K2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro K2000
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000 has 45% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2000 - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 229 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 3100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
45−50
55−60
QHD / 1440p
27−30
30−35
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
7−8
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Fortnite is 16% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
55−60
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M5950.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
27−30
medium / 768p
12−14
18−20
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro K2000
Architecture
Terascale 2
Kepler
Code name
Whistler-XT
GK107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
13 April 2011
1 March 2013
Pipelines
480
384
Core clock speed
725 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
30.53
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price
