FirePro M5950 vs Quadro T1000
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro T1000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Quadro T1000.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 42% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 670 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 7100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
FirePro M5950 and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Turing |
Code name | Whistler-XT | TU117 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Check Price |