FirePro M5950 vs Radeon E8860
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Radeon E8860 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E8860 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 has 5% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon E8860 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 150 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon E8860 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 3600 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Fortnite is 16% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |