FirePro M5950 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 286 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 717% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 2700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Fortnite is 5% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | R700 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 12 August 2008 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 28.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |