FirePro M5950 vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 28% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 7670A have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 7670A are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 3100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |