FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R7 M465X
When comparing FirePro M5950 and Radeon R7 M465X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R7 M465X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M465X
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M465X has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 175 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 3600 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 20% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 29% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 16% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |