FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M5950 stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 214% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 370 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 4700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Whistler-XT | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 480 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Check Price |