Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R9 380X

    In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 380X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 380X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro M5950 Check Price
    Radeon R9 380X Check Price

    FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:

    FirePro M5950 Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M5950 Radeon R9 380X
    Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 190 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Radeon R9 380X has 442% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
    • FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 380X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Radeon R9 380X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
    • FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 380X - in Desktops.
    • FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 380X - with GCN 3.0.
    • FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 380X - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 380X is 70 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 2−3 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 14−16 60−65
    medium / 1080p 6−7 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 380X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M5950 Radeon R9 380X
    Architecture Terascale 2 GCN 3.0
    Code name Whistler-XT Antigua
    Type Mobile workstation Desktop
    Release date 13 April 2011 19 November 2015
    Pipelines 480 2048
    Core clock speed 725 MHz
    Boost Clock 970 MHz
    Transistor count 716 million 5,000 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 17.40 124.2
    Floating-point performance 696.0 gflops 3,973 gflops
    Length 221 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 900 MHz 970 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 57 GB/s 182.4 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.2 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.0 6.3
    OpenGL 4.4 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 2.0
    Vulkan N/A +
    Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.58 kh/s
    FreeSync +
    Bus support n/a PCIe 3.0
    HDMI +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 67 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Eyefinity +
    HD3D +
    PowerTune +
    TrueAudio +
    ZeroCore +
    Mantle +
    Design reference
    Bridgeless CrossFire +
    Number of Eyefinity displays 6
    DisplayPort support +
    CrossFire +
    VCE +
    DDMA audio +
    Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.89 Gh/s
    Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 20.63 Mh/s
    Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 175 Sol/s
    Compute units 32
    Form factor MXM-A full height / full length
    High bandwidth memory (HBM) -
    LiquidVR +
    FRTC +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares