FirePro M5950 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX Vega M GH, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX Vega M GH.
FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX Vega M GH are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX Vega M GH are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
IGP
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GH has 185% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GH has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 338 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
FirePro M5950 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
18−20
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
3−4
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−12
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
40−45
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
1−2
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
9−10
65−70
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
9−10
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Architecture
Terascale 2
Vega
Code name
Whistler-XT
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 April 2011
7 January 2018
Pipelines
480
1536
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1063 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
114.2
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
3,656 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
204.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price