FirePro M5950 vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 757% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 168 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4112 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 514% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 563% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 733% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 355% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 555% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 288% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 680% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 611% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |