FirePro M6000 vs FirePro V5900

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6000 and FirePro V5900, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6000 stacks up against FirePro V5900, check out specs charts below.

FirePro M6000 Check Price

FirePro V5900 Check Price

FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:

FirePro M6000 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M6000	FirePro V5900
Power consumption (TDP)	43 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 74% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and FirePro V5900 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M6000 and FirePro V5900 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro V5900 - in Desktops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro V5900 - with TeraScale 3.
Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FirePro V5900 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 2500 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	4−5
ultra / 1080p	5−6	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	20−22	14−16
medium / 1080p	10−12	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	150−160	130−140
medium / 768p	120−130	100−110
ultra / 1080p	65−70	50−55
QHD / 1440p	35−40	24−27
4K / 2160p	27−30	12−14
high / 768p	95−100	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	55−60	50−55
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	85−90	80−85
medium / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	16−18
medium / 1080p	10−12	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	16−18	7−8
ultra / 1080p	12−14	0−1
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	70−75	55−60
medium / 1080p	30−33	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	−
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	60−65	50−55
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	16−18	10−11
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	3−4
ultra / 1080p	4−5	1−2
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	16−18	10−11
medium / 1080p	8−9	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
high / 1080p	95−100	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	80−85
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	16−18	10−11
medium / 1080p	12−14	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	30−35	20−22
medium / 768p	21−24	12−14
high / 1080p	10−12	6−7
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	50−55	40−45
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
high / 768p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro M6000	FirePro V5900
Architecture	GCN	TeraScale 3
Code name	Heathrow	Cayman
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 July 2012	24 May 2011
Pipelines	640	512
Core clock speed	750 MHz	600 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	32.00	19.20
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops	614.4 gflops
Length		230 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
Bus support	n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		66 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Form factor	MXM-B
StereoOutput3D	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M6000 vs FirePro V5900

FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares