FirePro M6000 vs FirePro W5100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6000 and FirePro W5100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6000 stacks up against FirePro W5100, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | FirePro W5100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 16% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and FirePro W5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro W5100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro W5100 - with GCN 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 180 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 and FirePro W5100 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 72% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M6000 and FirePro W5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | FirePro W5100 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Heathrow | Bonaire |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 31 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 44.64 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | full height / half length |
| StereoOutput3D | + | + |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |