FirePro M6000 vs GeForce 720A
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and GeForce 720A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 720A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 720A
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | GeForce 720A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M6000 has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce 720A.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce 720A uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6000 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 720A.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 720A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 720A - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 720A is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 and GeForce 720A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce 720A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 720A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 296% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 720A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 83% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 720A. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | GeForce 720A | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Heathrow | GF117 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 1 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 775 MHz |
Boost Clock | 938 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 585 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 15.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 360.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |