FirePro M6000 vs GeForce 940A
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and GeForce 940A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 940A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 940A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | GeForce 940A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M6000 has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce 940A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro M6000 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 940A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 940A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940A is 279 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 and GeForce 940A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce 940A. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | GeForce 940A | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
Code name | Heathrow | GM108 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |