FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 275
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000
GeForce GTX 275
Power consumption (TDP)
43 Watt
219 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
896 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 409% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 275 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 275 - in Desktops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 275 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 654 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 275 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 3366 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
130−140
medium / 768p
120−130
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
50−55
QHD / 1440p
35−40
27−30
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
95−100
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−11
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
high / 1080p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
30−35
24−27
medium / 768p
21−24
16−18
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
40−45
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
FirePro M6000
GeForce GTX 275
Architecture
GCN
Tesla 2.0
Code name
Heathrow
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 July 2012
15 January 2009
Pipelines
640
240
Core clock speed
750 MHz
1404 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
50.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
127.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
n/a
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-B
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
