FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 295
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 295, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6000 stacks up against GeForce GTX 295, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 572% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 492 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 3501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Heathrow | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |