FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When comparing FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 248% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6000 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 550 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 3% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro M6000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Heathrow | GF104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | n/a | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |