FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 750 Ti will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Power consumption (TDP)
43 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 39% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti - in Desktops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 270 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 4495 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
20−22
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 127% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
150−160
230−240
medium / 768p
120−130
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
90−95
4K / 2160p
27−30
50−55
high / 768p
95−100
160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Dota 2 is 60% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
120−130
medium / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Fortnite is 90% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
90−95
high / 1080p
16−18
40−45
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Metro Exodus is 142% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
30−35
70−75
medium / 768p
21−24
45−50
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FirePro M6000.
Full Specs
FirePro M6000
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Architecture
GCN
Maxwell
Code name
Heathrow
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 July 2012
18 February 2014
Pipelines
640
640
Core clock speed
750 MHz
1020 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
43.40
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
1,389 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
n/a
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Form factor
MXM-B
StereoOutput3D
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price