FirePro M6000 vs GRID K260Q
When comparing FirePro M6000 and GRID K260Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and GRID K260Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 423% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6000 and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- FirePro M6000 and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 72% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M6000 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 45% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro M6000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
Code name | Heathrow | GK104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |