FirePro M6000 vs GRID K280Q
When choosing between FirePro M6000 and GRID K280Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M6000 and GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 423% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- FirePro M6000 and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M6000 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 24% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 31% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Heathrow | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |