FirePro M6000 vs GRID M60 1Q
When comparing FirePro M6000 and GRID M60 1Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and GRID M60 1Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 1Q
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | GRID M60 1Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 423% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6000 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 193 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro M6000 and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 136% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 100−105 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 64% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 109% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FirePro M6000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | GRID M60 1Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Heathrow | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |