FirePro M6000 vs NVS 810
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
43 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 58% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M6000 and NVS 810 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and NVS 810 - in Desktops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 152 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 2700 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M6000 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
120−130
medium / 768p
120−130
95−100
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
95−100
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
medium / 768p
65−70
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
9−10
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
10−12
medium / 1080p
10−12
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−33
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 73% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
4−5
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
high / 1080p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
30−35
10−11
medium / 768p
21−24
8−9
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
FirePro M6000
NVS 810
Architecture
GCN
Maxwell
Code name
Heathrow
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 July 2012
4 November 2015
Pipelines
640
512
Core clock speed
750 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
33.06
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bus support
n/a
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-B
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
