FirePro M6000 vs Radeon Pro 570
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6000 and Radeon Pro 570, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6000 stacks up against Radeon Pro 570, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro 570
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 179% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 2280 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 209% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 28% more, than FirePro M6000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Heathrow | Polaris 20 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |