FirePro M6100 vs Radeon HD 7670A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6100 and Radeon HD 7670A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6100 stacks up against Radeon HD 7670A, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 7670A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6100 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro M6100 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- FirePro M6100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M6100 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6100 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Bonaire | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |