FirePro M6100 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between FirePro M6100 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- FirePro M6100 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M6100 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Bonaire | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |