FirePro M6100 vs Radeon R9 M360
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6100 and Radeon R9 M360, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6100 stacks up against Radeon R9 M360, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 M360
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
- FirePro M6100 and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 4875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M6100 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Bonaire | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Check Price |