FirePro M6100 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6100 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6100 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 526 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FirePro M6100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 45% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Bonaire | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |