FirePro M6100 vs Tesla M6
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M6100 and Tesla M6. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M6100 and Tesla M6. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M6
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 170 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- FirePro M6100 and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 238% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 240% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 264% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 197% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 337% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 207% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 294% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Bonaire | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |