FirePro M7740 vs FirePro S9000
When comparing FirePro M7740 and FirePro S9000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M7740 and FirePro S9000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | FirePro S9000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 483% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and FirePro S9000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro S9000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and FirePro S9000 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FirePro S9000 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4500 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 277% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | FirePro S9000 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | RV740 | Tahiti |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 24 August 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 100.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |