FirePro M7740 vs FireStream 9270
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and FireStream 9270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 166% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9270 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2600 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro M7740 and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 17% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | TeraScale |
| Code name | RV740 | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 13 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 30.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |