FirePro M7740 vs GeForce 920A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M7740 and GeForce 920A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M7740 stacks up against GeForce 920A, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GeForce 920A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 920A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 920A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 304 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 920A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 1002 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 73% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GeForce 920A | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | RV740 | GK208B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 30.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |