FirePro M7740 vs GeForce 930A
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and GeForce 930A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and GeForce 930A.
GeForce 930A
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GeForce 930A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce 930A.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 930A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 930A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 930A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GeForce 930A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930A is 278 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 930A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 930A is 1002 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GeForce 930A | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV740 | GM108 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 826 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 22.58 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |