FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 640M
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and GeForce GT 640M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 640M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GT 640M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M7740 and GeForce GT 640M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 or GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740
GeForce GT 640M
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
32 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M7740 has 87% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 640M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GT 640M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GT 640M - in Laptops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GeForce GT 640M - with Kepler.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 640M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 640M is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
10−12
medium / 1080p
8−9
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
85−90
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
10−11
high / 768p
80−85
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
40−45
ultra / 1080p
30−35
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
9−10
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p
50−55
40−45
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p
4−5
1−2
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
2−3
medium / 1080p
6−7
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
3−4
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p
24−27
7−8
medium / 768p
16−18
6−7
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
high / 768p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
Full Specs
FirePro M7740
GeForce GT 640M
Architecture
Terascale 1
Kepler
Code name
RV740
N13P-GS
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
4 August 2009
22 March 2012
Pipelines
640
384
Core clock speed
650 MHz
Boost Clock
645 MHz
Transistor count
826 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
20.80
Floating-point performance
832.0 gflops
480.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
1800 - 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
54.14 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 API
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
