FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GTX 285
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 285 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740
GeForce GTX 285
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
204 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 240% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 285 - in Desktops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 826 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 242 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
140−150
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
QHD / 1440p
27−30
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
80−85
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
8−9
8−9
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Fortnite is 3% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−12
QHD / 1440p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Minecraft is 1% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−12
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
24−27
24−27
medium / 768p
16−18
16−18
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
6−7
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
high / 768p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than FirePro M7740.
Full Specs
FirePro M7740
GeForce GTX 285
Architecture
Terascale 1
Tesla 2.0
Code name
RV740
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
4 August 2009
23 December 2008
Pipelines
640
240
Core clock speed
650 MHz
1476 MHz
Transistor count
826 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
20.80
51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
832.0 gflops
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
54.14 GB/s
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
4.1
4.0
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
