FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 166% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 3008 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M7740 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 29% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro M7740. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | RV740 | GF114 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 779 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M7740 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- FirePro M7740 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- FirePro M7740 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- FirePro M7740 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M