FirePro M7740 vs GRID K280Q

When comparing FirePro M7740 and GRID K280Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M7740 and GRID K280Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro M7740 Check Price

GRID K280Q

FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:

FirePro M7740 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M7740	GRID K280Q
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID K280Q has 275% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K280Q has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 95 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	16−18	24−27
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M7740 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	180−190
medium / 768p	110−120	150−160
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
QHD / 1440p	27−30	45−50
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	80−85	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	8−9	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	85−90
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 51% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	12−14	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 61% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	65−70
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	4−5	7−8
ultra / 1080p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	6−7	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	24−27	40−45
medium / 768p	16−18	27−30
high / 1080p	9−10	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FirePro M7740.

Full Specs

	FirePro M7740	GRID K280Q
Architecture	Terascale 1	Kepler
Code name	RV740	GK104
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 August 2009	28 June 2013
Pipelines	640	1536
Core clock speed	650 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	826 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	20.80	95.36
Floating-point performance	832.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	54.14 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Laptop size	large
	Check Price

FirePro M7740 vs GRID K280Q

FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares