FirePro M7740 vs GRID M60 8Q
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and GRID M60 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 275% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 93 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 4012 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 133% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M7740. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | RV740 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 826 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |