FirePro M7740 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing FirePro M7740 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M7740 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M7740 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M7740 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M7740 has 33% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M7740 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
160−170
medium / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
QHD / 1440p
27−30
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
80−85
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
24−27
30−35
medium / 768p
16−18
21−24
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro M7740.
Full Specs
FirePro M7740
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Terascale 1
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
RV740
Haswell GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
4 August 2009
5 June 2013
Pipelines
640
40
Core clock speed
650 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
826 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
20.80
52.00
Floating-point performance
832.0 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
54.14 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
