FirePro M7740 vs Quadro 7000
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Quadro 7000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 7000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 240% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 1 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 and Quadro 7000 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 2404 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 111% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than FirePro M7740. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | RV740 | GF110 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 651 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3404 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |