FirePro M7740 vs Quadro K2200
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and Quadro K2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and Quadro K2200.
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740
Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 13% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K2200 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200 - in Desktops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 396 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 4012 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
27−30
75−80
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
80−85
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 114% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
24−27
65−70
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than FirePro M7740.
Full Specs
FirePro M7740
Quadro K2200
Architecture
Terascale 1
Maxwell
Code name
RV740
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
4 August 2009
22 July 2014
Pipelines
640
640
Core clock speed
650 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
826 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
20.80
44.96
Floating-point performance
832.0 gflops
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
54.14 GB/s
80.19 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
