FirePro M7740 vs Quadro K2200M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M7740 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M7740 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 8% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 17 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 4012 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 133% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 26% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M7740. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Maxwell |
Code name | RV740 | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |