Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M7740 vs Quadro K620

    When comparing FirePro M7740 and Quadro K620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M7740 and Quadro K620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro M7740 Check Price
    Quadro K620 Check Price

    FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:

    FirePro M7740 Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M7740 Quadro K620
    Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 41 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 128 Bit
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro M7740 has 46% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
    • FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K620 - in Desktops.
    • FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 408 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
    • FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 6−7 10−12
    ultra / 1080p 4−5 6−7
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
    low / 720p 16−18 24−27
    medium / 1080p 8−9 14−16
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 55% more, than FirePro M7740.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M7740 Quadro K620
    Architecture Terascale 1 Maxwell
    Code name RV740 GM107
    Type Mobile workstation Workstation
    Release date 4 August 2009 22 July 2014
    Pipelines 640 384
    Core clock speed 650 MHz 1058 MHz
    Boost Clock 1124 MHz
    Transistor count 826 million 1,870 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 20.80 26.98
    Floating-point performance 832.0 gflops 863.2 gflops
    Length 160 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 54.14 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 10.1 (10_1) 12
    Shader Model 4.1 5
    OpenGL 3.3 4.5
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A +
    CUDA 5.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 104 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    Width 1" (2.5 cm)
    Number of simultaneous displays 4
    nView Desktop Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares